[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071112213431.GE11244@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:34:31 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: mel@....ul.ie, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major mke2fs slowdown (reproducable, bisected)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:39:15AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >
> > Cross-compile farm here migrated to .ccache and build dir on separate
> > disks and now I have a way to blow up .ccache without waiting half an
> > hour for rm(1) to finish. It's called mke2fs(8).
> >
> > However, in e.g 2.6.24-rc2 mke2fs is amazingly slow if done right after
> > several fat cross-compile builds. Normally it takes ~11 seconds to
> > finish. After commit 5adc5be7cd1bcef6bb64f5255d2a33f20a3cf5be aka
> > "Bias the placement of kernel pages at lower PFNs" it takes several
> > minutes. 2.6.24-rc2 without this patch also gives normal mkfs speeds.
> > I'm pretty sure bisection wasn't screwed up.
>
> Can you (just to make sure) do a "git revert" of this commit on top of the
> current tree, and verify that that makes it all work fine again too? If
> so, let's just revert it.
>
> I just want to make sure that there isn't some subtle interaction with
> anything else in there.
OK, with 2.6.24-rc2-6e800af233e0bdf108efb7bd23c11ea6fa34cdeb
mkfs took 4m6.915s seconds. With just "lower PFNs" patch reverted it's
back to 10 seconds.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists