[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711130923.12616.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:23:12 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module loader should not complain about unknown symbol
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 01:18:27 Jan Glauber wrote:
> If module A depends on module B and module B has not yet finished its
> init() the module loader may print a warning about an unknown symbol.
>
> This happens if module B is still in state MODULE_STATE_COMING,
> as module A runs into resolve_symbol() for a symbol from module B.
> resolve_symbol() return 0 in that case and causes the warning.
It also happens when a symbol is undefined, so this patch is a bad idea.
To do this properly you would change strong_try_module_get to return -EBUSY
and -ENOENT, then change use_module(), then finally resolve_symbol(), then
only print a warning when it returns something other than -EBUSY.
Better might be to put in a waitqueue and wake it up whenever a module is
deleted or changes status. Then use_module() can wait if
strong_try_module_get() returns -EBUSY (up to 30 seconds, then print a
warning and fail).
Hope that helps,
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists