linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Include header required for INT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711120551380.23072@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:51:54 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>, axboe@...nel.dk,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Include header required for INT_MAX

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> writes:
>
> > No, because I be damn sure that some developers try compiling programs
> > in non-linux environments (cygwin, solaris, andyourpersonaldistro, you
> > name it) which do not have to adhere to <limits.h>. It might use
> > <cosmiclimits.h> instead, or whatever.
>
> Every C compiler has <limit.h>.

i'm assuming you mean <limits.h>, no?

rday
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/