linux-kernel - Re: [patch] prepare kprobes code for x86 unification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47384D34.6070000@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 07:55:16 -0500
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...x.de, mingo@...e.hu,
	hpa@...or.com, ananth@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] prepare kprobes code for x86 unification

Hi Arjan,

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> Subject: prepare kprobes code for x86 unification
> 
> This patch is a first step towards unification of the kprobes
> infrastructure between 32 and 64 bit x86; the patch is mostly
> about removing spurious whitespace changes and about adding
> harmless includes and the like to make the 32/64 files more
> identical.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven

I got a bug in this patch. In kprobes_64.c, Since this added __kprobes
to kretprobe_trampoline_holder(), the arch_init_kprobes() failed to
insert a kprobe into that function, and the initialization was failed.
This means that kprobe_exceptions_notify() was not registered to
die_notifier_chain. So, it caused a kernel crash.

> @@ -385,7 +428,7 @@ no_kprobe:
>   * here. When a retprobed function returns, this probe is hit and
>   * trampoline_probe_handler() runs, calling the kretprobe's handler.
>   */
> - void kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void)
> + void __kprobes kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void)
>   {
>   	asm volatile (  ".global kretprobe_trampoline\n"
>   			"kretprobe_trampoline: \n"

On i386, I introduced kretprobe-booster, which did not need to insert
a kprobe. Thus, I also added __kprobes to kretprobe_trampoline_holder()
on i386.

I think we can remove __kprobes from kretprobe_trampoline_holder()
in kprobes_32.c if you'd like to make the both same. However, it
is not safe. So we need a comment on top explaining why it does not
have that annotation and users must take care of it.

By the way, I'm porting boosters to x86-64 (and ia64). Since some parts
of that will be covered by this patch, I'd like to know your unification
plan.

Best regards,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/