linux-kernel - Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1194876201.5656.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:03:21 +0000
From:	Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?

On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:27 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> We fail rather than sleep in the "dependency isn't ready" case.  Partially 
> because it's not happened before, but partially because we risk nasty loops.

If we fail since we have to in the "dependency isn't ready" case then
the warning seems quite useless. I'll send a patch in a seperate mail
to remove the warning.

-jang

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/