[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47398C4A.40806@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:36:42 -0200
From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, chrisw@...s-sol.org, avi@...ranet.com,
anthony@...emonkey.ws, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
lguest@...abs.org, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
zach@...are.com, jun.nakajima@...el.com,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, kiran@...lemp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/24] make vsmp a paravirt client
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andi Kleen escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 04:43:05PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
>> This patch makes vsmp a paravirt client. It now uses the whole
>> infrastructure provided by pvops. When we detect we're running
>> a vsmp box, we change the irq-related paravirt operations (and so,
>> it have to happen quite early), and the patching function
>
> The PARAVIRT ifdefs look wrong. Surely you don't need them at all
> because it cannot work at all without paravirt.
The vsmp_64.c file is now compiled unconditionally, according to which
me and kiran agreed to. The detection code is always run, but will only
trigger when a suitable box is found. Accordingly, the paravirt structs
are only touched when PARAVIRT is on. Otherwise, we don't even have the
symbols.
> Also you got some white space damage.
Thanks, will fix.
> And the "EM64T based comment" is wrong because there are AMD based
> vSMPs too.
Just got it as-is from the old Kconfig. Do you think it should be fixed
as well?
> -Andi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHOYxKjYI8LaFUWXMRApS3AJwJSYjW4Lw3dnPR4yMNfXABnMoQQQCcDMnf
3wBQoPjGO/8HO1Os4Y21vIU=
=S+KO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists