[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4739DD2F.5060605@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:21:51 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, lguest@...abs.org, kiran@...lemp.com,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/24] make vsmp a paravirt client
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> the ifdef only exists because, as I said, the code itself will be always
> compiled in, to avoid an ifdef in setup_64.c. So it's just a taking it
> from here, putting it there issue. Kiran seem to prefer this way, but I
> don't really have a preference.
It would be better to have the ifdef in setup_64.c and just make the
compilation of vsmp_64.c depend on CONFIG_X86_VSMP. If the ifdef really
rankles you could use a weak stub function somewhere, or define an
inline stub in vsmp.h.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists