linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH revised] enable make ARCH=x86 (and stay backward compatible)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:22:01 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, david@...g.hm,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH revised] enable make ARCH=x86 (and stay backward compatible)

> 
> I've just built v2.6.24-rc2-409-g9418d5d + your patchset for both amd64 and 
> i386 using Debian's kernel-package and both went without problems.

Thanks for testing!

> One (minor) issue. If I start out with a .config for i386, the first make 
> oldconfig will ask to set 64-BIT:
>     64-bit kernel (64BIT) [N/y/?] (NEW)
> It would be nice if that could be avoided somehow.

I do not see this can be avoided.
The typical response is just to accept the default which is N
so we are safe in most cases anyway because default is 'N'.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/