[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711140125.17891.ak@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:25:17 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: CaT <cat@....com.au>
Cc: patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [13/45] x86_64: Increase VDSO_TEXT_OFFSET for ancient binutils
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 01:21:07 CaT wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:44:54PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > For some reason old binutils genertate larger headers so
> > increase the text offset of the vdso to avoid linker errors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> >
> > ---
> > arch/x86_64/vdso/voffset.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux/arch/x86_64/vdso/voffset.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/vdso/voffset.h
> > +++ linux/arch/x86_64/vdso/voffset.h
> > @@ -1 +1 @@
> > -#define VDSO_TEXT_OFFSET 0x500
> > +#define VDSO_TEXT_OFFSET 0x600
>
> This still breaks under Debian sarge. There is this (german) forum
> thread about it:
iirc sarge was the one with the unfixable 2MB text pages, generating gigantic
vDSOs. At least from my side i essentially gave up on that one because
there was no way to generate a reasonable vDSO.
You'll need to either up- or downgrade your binutils. There was only a narrow
window where binutils were broken such, but that release unfortunately hit it.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists