[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711140850210.3265@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:57:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Allessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: fix typo that makes sync_cmos_clock erratic
David,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, David P. Reed wrote:
> From: David P. Reed
>
> Fix a typo in ntp.c that has caused updating of the persistent (RTC) clock
> when synced to NTP to behave erratically.
Good catch.
> Signed-off-by: David P. Reed
Whitespace damaged as well. Please fix and resend
> ---
> When debugging a freeze that arises on my AMD64 machines when I run the
> ntpd service, I added a number of printk's to monitor the sync_cmos_clock
> procedure. I discovered that it was not syncing to cmos RTC every 11 minutes
> as documented, but instead would keep trying every second for hours at a time.
> The reason turned out to be a typo in sync_cmos_clock, where it attempts to
> ensure that update_persistent_clock is called very close to 500 msec. after a
> 1 second boundary (required by the PC RTC's spec). That typo referred to
> "xtime" in one spot, rather than "now", which is derived from "xtime" but not
> equal to it. This makes the test erratic, creating a "coin-flip" that decides
> when update_persistent_clock is called - when it is called, which is rarely,
> it may be at any time during the one second period, rather than close to 500
> msec, so the value written is needlessly incorrect, too.
Please put the explanation into the changelog.
> The patch works in 2.6.24rc2, but it should also work in 2.6.23.
Yup
> @@ -205,7 +206,10 @@ static void sync_cmos_clock(unsigned lon
> return;
>
> getnstimeofday(&now);
> - if (abs(xtime.tv_nsec - (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2)) <= tick_nsec / 2)
Can we just s/xtime/now/ ? There is no value in an extra variable.
Thanks,
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists