[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3sl39yrnv.fsf@ursa.amorsen.dk>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:48:04 +0100
From: Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [e1000 VLAN] Disable vlan hw accel when promiscuous mode
>>>>> "AK" == Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> writes:
AK> actually the impact can be quite negative, imagine doing a tcpdump
AK> on a 10gig interface with vlan's enabled - all of a sudden you
AK> might accidentally flood the system with a 100-fold increase in
AK> traffic and force the stack to dump all those packets for you.
Why is the switch sending you all that traffic for VLAN's you don't
care about? I have a hard time imagining such a scenario. Sure, you
could have forgotten to limit the VLAN range sent to a particular
host, or even have decided that it's administratively easier to just
allow everything, but the switch still won't send unicast traffic out
that port unless the destination MAC matches. If broadcast or
non-solicited multicast takes up most of your bandwidth, you have
other problems.
/Benny
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists