[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071114183625.GC17112@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:36:25 -0700
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
gregkh@...e.de, kristen.c.accardi@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org,
rick.jones2@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
pcihpd-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects
Hi Gary,
* Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 07:42:37AM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > * Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>:
> > >
> > > I am not fundamentally opposed to this new capability but share
> > > the same concerns that Greg and others have expressed. So far,
> > > I have only tried the changes on one single node system (IBM
> > > x3850) but the below NAK-worthy result supports the idea that
> > > the changes need to be well and widely tested.
> >
> > Can you send me the lspci -vv and lspci -vt output from this
> > machine?
>
> Alex, I added some slot number hints to the below `lspci -vt`
> output.
Thanks.
> I am still looking at your other message and will have some
> hopefully helpful comments soon. I did apply all 5 patches,
> 4 was a typo.
Actually, I just reworked my patch this morning, and believe that
I have a much cleaner implementation now that should fix a lot of
the errors you saw.
Incoming!
Thanks.
/ac
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists