[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071114.115601.00715073.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:56:01 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: rdunlap@...otime.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
protasnb@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
> In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
> some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all
> on lkml we'd all be aware of it.
That's a rediculious argument.
One other reason these bugs are resolved, is that the networking
developers only need to subscribe to netdev and not have to listen to
all the noise on lkml.
People who want to manage bugs know what list to look on and
contact about problems.
Dumping even more crap on lkml is not the answer.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists