[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <473A4DDE.4090404@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:22:38 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: revert exports to restore old behaviour
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> NACK, both of these are internal and graphics drivers should not be
> using them.
>
I don't feel very strongly about it either way. I think the two
arguments for it are:
1. it's a regression compared to previous kernels
2. it's a visible difference between CONFIG_PARAVIRT and
non-CONFIG_PARAVIRT
Arguments against are all the usual ones.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists