[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071114220022.GB19850@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:00:22 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>,
gregkh@...e.de, lenb@...nel.org, matthew@....cx,
rick.jones2@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pcihpd-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:42:21PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> * Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:37:08AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > >
> > > So I agree that the firmware kit has a clever hack that works
> > > on much existing x86 firmware, and it sounds like Tivoli
> > > might even rely on it. But I don't feel good about it, and
> > > it could easily break when some BIOS writer needs to make
> > > _SUN slightly more complicated.
> >
> > Do you know of such BIOSes out there that do this? Will the
> > above scheme not work for the ia64 boxes that you know of that
> > are out in the world today?
>
> One last mail on this subject -- Bjorn has pointed out to me that
> the Dell pe6800 and rez1850 both implement _SUN as control
> methods today.
Does the firmware kit break on them?
> Does Tivoli run on those machines? If so, how is it getting slot
> information?
I have no idea, I don't work for them :)
good luck,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists