[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071113.180009.56326652.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:00:09 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: clameter@....com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dada1@...mosbay.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 01/28] cpu alloc: The allocator
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:50:24 -0800 (PST)
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> > BTW, I'm going to stop testing your patches on sparc64 for
> > a while until you start to make me feel like you understand
> > that ignoring the BSS bloat issue is bad.
>
> Well this is just the fallback. How can I avoid this and still keep a
> constant? Add a new segment to vmlinux.lds.S?
I'm not so sure.
The idea about doling out vmalloc space seemed the most promising.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists