[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711131803530.6713@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:05:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dada1@...mosbay.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 01/28] cpu alloc: The allocator
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, David Miller wrote:
> The idea about doling out vmalloc space seemed the most promising.
Well that is basically the same as the virtual mode. Just ditch the
fallback mode? vmalloc directly does not guarantee a fixed address.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists