[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071115081017.GS6347@axis.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:10:18 +0100
From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mikael Starvik <mikael.starvik@...s.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CRISv10 fasttimer: Scrap INLINE and name timeval_cmp better
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:29:17PM -0800, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2007 09:08, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > /* Not true gettimeofday, only checks the jiffies (uptime) + useconds */
> > -void __INLINE__ do_gettimeofday_fast(struct fasttime_t *tv)
> > +inline void do_gettimeofday_fast(struct fasttime_t *tv)
>
> Why these functions are not "static inline"?
> Wthout "static", gcc will actually create non-inlined version of them!
>
> $ cat t.c
> inline int f() { return 1; }
> int g() { return f(); }
> $ gcc -O2 -c t.c
> $ nm --size-sort t.o
> 0000000a T f <=================== !!!
> 0000000a T g
Quite true, I'll put that on the "to check" pile.
> P.S. whitespace style in fasttimer.c doesn't match rest of the kernel
> (kernel uses tab, not 2-spaces indentation). Curly braces don't match too:
> if (t0->tv_sec < t1->tv_sec)
> {
> return -1;
> }
> should be
> if (t0->tv_sec < t1->tv_sec) {
> return -1;
> }
Yup, that item is already on my "to fix" list.
> --
> vda
Thanks for your comments!
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@...s.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists