[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071115190529.4129deb4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:05:29 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 (memory hotplug x86_64/vmemmap fix)
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:39:15 +0000
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> wrote:
> Can you explain "this is bug" for me. The routine was __init_refok and
> therefore ! __init and therefore always present. The logic there must
> guarentee it only calls the bootmem allocator in early boot, and the logic
> has not changed with the annotation change so it should have been safe.
> If by "this is bug" you are saying this is the cause of the warning then
> yes that is true, else could you elaborate.
>
Sorry I misunderstood that __init.refok is a section which is freed after boot.
I confrimed it's just a .text section. sorry.
> > +static void __init_refok *__call_bootmem_alloc(int nid, int array_size)
>
> This indirect makes sense for the sparse safety aspect, only letting the
> caller use this one routine. I wonder if the name should be more
> explicit. earlyonly_bootmem_alloc() or something, so that a later
> reader knows from the call site that this is magical and care needs to
> be exercised here.
ok.
Thank you for review.
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists