[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711152157.59409.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:57:59 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mpm@...enic.com, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bug] SLOB crash, 2.6.24-rc2
On Thursday 15 November 2007 21:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
> > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:37:13 -0600
> >
> > > No, the usual strategy for debugging problems -outside- SLOB is to
> > > switch to another allocator with more extensive debugging facilities.
> >
> > Ok, so the thing we still can do is do a dump_stack() at the list
> > debugging assertion trigger points.
>
> ok, i'll first try to trigger it again.
I had implemented SLOB in userspace, so I resynched and think I
found your problem. Sorry for the attachment format -- this mailer
isn't the best. I'm really computer illiterate when it comes to
userspace...
Anyway, I'm really happy to see you're testing and using SLOB
upstream :) Is there any particular reason that you're using it?
Thanks,
Nick
View attachment "slob-rotate-fix.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (870 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists