[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071115113521.GB5035@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:35:21 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Attempt to get eject failures back to ioctl(CDROMEJECT)
On Thu, Nov 15 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007 19:47:05 Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > If blk_rq_map_sg returns more than was allocated, it's a bug, and
> > > something's already been overwritten. BUG_ON() is probably the right
> > > thing here.
> >
> > It really just means that it mapped more segments than the block layer
> > said it would. Usually that wont overwrite memory here since scsi rounds
> > up on allocating the sg list, but it indeed can. Similar code has been
> > in scsi_lib.c for ages, I'd suggest covering that in the same patch.
>
> Good point. I assume that you've not seen these printks in recent memory?
I have not, they usually show up if we have bugs in the merge accounting
logic in the block layer (the merge functions and blk_rq_map_sg() not
agreeing). It's been ages since that was an issue, so I'm fine with the
bug.
> This covers both cases:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] scsi: BUG_ON() impossible condition.
You can add my
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
when you pass it through James, it should go in that way.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists