[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711150739490.9736@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:42:28 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, i2c@...sensors.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers/i2c: Drop redundant includes of
moduleparam.h
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
... snip ...
> I share Robert's point of view here. Relying on header files
> including each other is usually not a good idea, as build then
> breaks when the headers are cleaned up or reorganized.
... more snip ...
> If there's a fundamental reason why module.h has to include
> moduleparam.h, then both headers should be merged in a single file.
> If not, then both header files should be clearly split and drivers
> should include each of them as needed. Either way, header files must
> be fixed first, and drivers adjusted in consequence. So, I'm not
> taking this patch, sorry.
keeping this short and sweet, i updated my wiki page on this topic:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Module.h_and_moduleparam.h
i think the fundamental question here is whether this is even
cleanable without massive disruption.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists