[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711150849100.2786@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:50:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/16] skge: fix ram buffer size calculation
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> I can't reproduce the users problem with the hardware I have. And
> without the patch the dual port board doesn't work. So it is a question
> of regression, versus fixing pre-existing bugs.
Yeah. Five years ago I might have said that it's important to fix
pre-existing bugs, but all the ACPI and suspend etc problems have long
since convinced me that regressions are *much* more important than stuff
that never worked.
> I am okay with reverting the patch, as a temporary state, but concerned
> with how to make progress in fixing this.
Well, the original bug-report did contain a suggested workaround too.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists