[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071115180436.GA23517@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:04:36 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] x86: revert X86_HT semantics change
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The x86 unification resulted in CONFIG_X86_HT no longer being
> set if (X86_32 && MK8).
Yup - my bad. I wrongly assumed MK8 was an X86_64 thing.
Thanks for fixing this.
>
> After grep'ing through the tree I think the problem is that different
> places have different assumptions about the semantics of CONFIG_X86_HT,
> either:
> - hyperthreading or
> - multicore
> and the SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC dependencies are just one of the
> symptoms.
>
> This should be sorted out properly, but until then we should keep the
> 2.6.23 status quo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
I assume Thomas & Co will forward the patch.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists