[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711151045060.28051@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:49:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
cc: andi@...stfloor.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dada1@...mosbay.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 01/28] cpu alloc: The allocator
Well there is an LWN article now that also claims that the cpu_alloc
patchset requires a large bss space. Sigh. See
http://lwn.net/Articles/257828/
Not true! 44 bytes is reasonable.
christoph@...pp:~/linux-2.6$ size mm/cpu_alloc.o
text data bss dec hex filename
5625 36 44 5705 1649 mm/cpu_alloc.o
Need to separate out the virtualization into a separate patch in V2 to
make clear that it is there.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists