[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <473BC620.9020204@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:08:00 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata_sg_setup_one vs ata_sg_setup?
Rusty Russell wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Was looking through libata, and it seems to me that ata_sg_setup is a
> superset of ata_sg_setup_one. Am I missing something? Seems like it could
> be simplified.
>
> My machine never seems to do an ata_sg_setup_one, so this patch isn't really
> tested...
I have about the same patch queued here which also kills
ata_sg_init_one() completely and replaces
ATA_QCFLAG_SG/ATA_QCFLAG_SINGLE with ATA_QCFLAG_DMAMAP (now a single
flag). I'll compare your version and mine and see if mine is missing
something.
Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists