[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711151426280.4260@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:31:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>,
Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
robm@...tmail.fm, riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>
Subject: Re: mmap dirty limits on 32 bit kernels (Was: [BUG] New Kernel
Bugs)
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Chris Friesen wrote:
>
> We've got some 32-bit 8GB boxes for which both of these would hold true.
Still not enough of a reason for me to care.
Remember - I'm the guy who refused to merge RH's 4G:4G patches because I
thought they were an unsupportable nightmare.
I care a lot about future supportability, and HIGHMEM is there purely as a
temporary wart and blip on the screen.
I did acknowledge that others may care more, but the fact is, I suspect
that it's going to be cheaper to literally buy and ship a new machine to a
customer than to really "suppport" it in any other form.
Side note: HIGHMEM64G works perfectly fine with 12GB of RAM under
*limited*loads*. If your customer does certain well-defined and simple
things that don't put huge and varied loads on the VFS or VM layer, then
12GB+ is probably fine regardless.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists