linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071114.162714.88176942.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:27:14 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, clameter@....com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression
 with tbench

From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:21:36 +1100

> On Thursday 15 November 2007 10:46, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:48:44 +0800
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> >
> > Applied and I'll queue it up for -stable too.
> 
> Good result. Thanks, everyone!

This case is a good example to use the next time a stupid thread
starts up about bug reports not being looked into.  To me it's
seems clearly more a matter of the quality of the bug report.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/