[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071116153928.GA6162@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:39:28 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/6] sclp: call sclp_init() from start_kernel().
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:29:45PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > #else
> > static inline void acpi_early_init(void) { }
> > #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
> > +extern int sclp_init(void);
> > +#else
> > +static inline int sclp_init(void) {return 0;}
> > +#endif
> > #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
> > static inline void mark_rodata_ro(void) { }
> > #endif
> > @@ -643,6 +648,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> > check_bugs();
> >
> > acpi_early_init(); /* before LAPIC and SMP init */
> > + sclp_init();
>
> What happens if sclp_init fails? The other early init calls explicitely
> returns void and handels the error internal.
Nothing. I used to have an sclp call within __cpu_up() but that is gone
since I rewrote the patch that follows this one.
So this patch is just a leftover and I forgot that it isn't needed anymore.
Will be dropped.
Thanks for the hint!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists