[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711161424540.6758@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:25:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PERCPU : __percpu_alloc_mask() can dynamically size
percpu_data storage
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Instead of allocating a fix sized array of NR_CPUS pointers for percpu_data,
> we can use nr_cpu_ids, which is generally < NR_CPUS.
Yes we can. Could you either use [] or [0] instead of the index there?
Somehow the patch vanished when I replied to it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists