[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071115.185854.85318344.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:58:54 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: clameter@....com
Cc: corbet@....net, andi@...stfloor.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dada1@...mosbay.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 01/28] cpu alloc: The allocator
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:55:21 -0800 (PST)
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> > Sparc32 is still broken, as just one of several possible examples.
>
> I have not looked at sparc32 sorry. If you simply set up a couple of
> configuration values in arch/sparc32/Kconfig then everything will be fine.
There is assembler code to write, which as I stated several
times nobody is going to work on or test.
It is unreasonable to add this new VMEMMAP requirement in order for
your patches to work properly.
> > The BSS usage is still there for platforms that don't use VMEMMAP.
>
> All MMU platforms can use the virtual mappings. The main use of the static
> configuration is for embedded systems.
Someone has to implement and test VMEMMAP now on all of these
architectures, it is becomming a requirement unlike in the sparsemem
patches case where it was optional.
That's unreasonable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists