[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64bb37e0711152129l104752d1nb2422ef5aabae8e6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:29:36 +0100
From: "Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: jblunck@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bfields@...ldses.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1
On Nov 15, 2007 10:34 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:24:12 +0100
> "Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
> > The problem with the first bisect-try was, that everything between
> > bisect-good: r-o-bind-mounts-elevate-write-count-over-calls-to-vfs_rename
> > and
> > bisect-bad: use-struct-path-in-struct-svc_export
> > did not compile like this:
> >
> > CC [M] fs/nfsd/vfs.o
> > fs/nfsd/vfs.c: In function 'nfsd_rename':
> > fs/nfsd/vfs.c:1695: error: request for member 'mnt' in something not a
> > structure or union
>
> argh. I'd incorrectly worked out that
> nfsd-fix-wrong-mnt_writer-count-in-rename.patch was a fix against
> r-o-bind-mounts-elevate-write-count-over-calls-to-vfs_rename.patch however
> it is in fact a fix against use-struct-path-in-struct-svc_export.patch.
>
> My life sucks.
>
I think the placement was correct, but the patch itself was made
against a tree that already contained the changes from
use-struct-path-in-struct-svc_export.patch.
nfsd-fix-wrong-mnt_writer-count-in-rename.patch should have used the
old naming ex_mnt and only use-struct-path-in-struct-svc_export.patch
should have changed it to ex_path.mnt.
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists