[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <473EE01F.BA47.005A.0@novell.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:35:43 -0500
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@...hat.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/17] Remove some CFS specific code from the
wakeup path of RT tasks
>>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 1:21 AM, in message
<20071117062404.672976284@...dmis.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
wrote:
> -/*
> - * wake_idle() will wake a task on an idle cpu if task->cpu is
> - * not idle and an idle cpu is available. The span of cpus to
> - * search starts with cpus closest then further out as needed,
> - * so we always favor a closer, idle cpu.
> - *
> - * Returns the CPU we should wake onto.
> - */
> -#if defined(ARCH_HAS_SCHED_WAKE_IDLE)
> -static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
> -{
> - cpumask_t tmp;
> - struct sched_domain *sd;
> - int i;
> -
> - /*
> - * If it is idle, then it is the best cpu to run this task.
> - *
> - * This cpu is also the best, if it has more than one task already.
> - * Siblings must be also busy(in most cases) as they didn't already
> - * pickup the extra load from this cpu and hence we need not check
> - * sibling runqueue info. This will avoid the checks and cache miss
> - * penalities associated with that.
> - */
> - if (idle_cpu(cpu) || cpu_rq(cpu)->nr_running > 1)
> - return cpu;
> -
> - for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> - if (sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE) {
> - cpus_and(tmp, sd->span, p->cpus_allowed);
> - for_each_cpu_mask(i, tmp) {
> - if (idle_cpu(i)) {
> - if (i != task_cpu(p)) {
> - schedstat_inc(p,
> - se.nr_wakeups_idle);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]
> --- linux-compile.git.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c 2007-11-16 11:16:38.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-compile.git/kernel/sched_fair.c 2007-11-16 22:23:39.000000000 -0500
> @@ -564,6 +564,137 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
> }
>
> /*
> + * wake_idle() will wake a task on an idle cpu if task->cpu is
> + * not idle and an idle cpu is available. The span of cpus to
> + * search starts with cpus closest then further out as needed,
> + * so we always favor a closer, idle cpu.
> + *
> + * Returns the CPU we should wake onto.
> + */
> +#if defined(ARCH_HAS_SCHED_WAKE_IDLE)
> +static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + cpumask_t tmp;
> + struct sched_domain *sd;
> + int i;
> +
> + /*
> + * If it is idle, then it is the best cpu to run this task.
> + *
> + * This cpu is also the best, if it has more than one task already.
> + * Siblings must be also busy(in most cases) as they didn't already
> + * pickup the extra load from this cpu and hence we need not check
> + * sibling runqueue info. This will avoid the checks and cache miss
> + * penalities associated with that.
> + */
> + if (idle_cpu(cpu) || cpu_rq(cpu)->nr_running > 1)
> + return cpu;
> +
> + for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> + if (sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE) {
> + cpus_and(tmp, sd->span, p->cpus_allowed);
> + for_each_cpu_mask(i, tmp) {
> + if (idle_cpu(i))
> + return i;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Looks like some stuff that was added in 24 was inadvertently lost in the move when you merged the patches up from 23.1-rt11. The attached patch is updated to move the new logic as well.
Regards,
-Greg
View attachment "sched-de-cfsize-rt-path.patch" of type "text/plain" (13090 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists