linux-kernel - Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1195323177.25393.56.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date:	Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:12:57 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals

On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 19:04 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> split the list with you? Feel free to take any of those :-) dev->sem is 
> nontrivial and probably not possible right now - and some of the others 
> might be problematic too. But there might be fixable ones in the list. 
> This shouldnt become like the BKL conversion - never truly finished.

If I said I was going to do some set, at least it's more likely that the
work isn't duplicated..

What specifically is wrong with dev->sem ?

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/