linux-kernel - Re: Is it possible to give the user the option to cancel forkbombs?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1195281942.15929.5.camel@Orchestrator>
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:45:42 -0800
From:	Dane Mutters <dmutters@...il.com>
To:	Martin Olsson <mnemo@...imum.se>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Ubuntu Devel Discuss <ubuntu-devel-discuss@...ts.ubuntu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible to give the user the option to cancel forkbombs?

I thought you might find this helpful.  (I brought this issue up with
the Slackware folks once, and they told me basically this.)

http://wiki.craz1.homelinux.com/index.php/Linux:Security:Forkbomb

I was also told that the ability to spawn such rampant forks/processes
is controlled by default in Debian.  Is this the case?

Here is an LQ thread where I brought it up:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-security-4/how-can-i-prevent-forkbombs-338560/

I would like to see something done about this, with Ubuntu as popular as
it is, even as a server in some cases.  Is there a way that in the
future, one could simply download a package or click a box or something
and have a limit set, like the links suggest?  That would make things
just "that much" more convenient for system administrators (and might
help them/us to remember to set these limits, too...).

Thanks.

-Dane


On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 23:04 -0800, Martin Olsson wrote:
> Sorry about that, I checked the "has security impact" checkbox and that 
> marked it as private by default. This is a very well known problem 
> though so keeping secret certainly does not make sense. I have manually 
> removed the "private" flag now.
> 
> The content of the bug report was as follows:
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> Repro steps:
> 
> 1. Install gutsy gibbon (or probably any ubuntu)
> 2. Start a gnome terminal
> 3. Run this command:
> 
>     :(){ :|:& };:
> 
> 4. Ubuntu starts to work furiously, after less than a second terminal 
> gets flooded with "low resources" message, and within a few seconds the 
> whole machine breaks down complete to the point where no a single pixel 
> is updated and the mouse cannot be moved at all. It's not possible to 
> escape to a ALT-Fn console terminal and CTRL-ALT-DEL does not work.
> 
> Okay, so this is not as bad as winnuke.exe because it's not remote but I 
> just did it on my shared hosting co and their server went down. And I 
> mean seriously, there should be a way for a user to abort stuff that 
> hogs resources this type of complete breakdown is NEVER acceptible. I 
> had to power of the machine and my file system got royally screwed (long 
> fsck etc).
> 
> Some of you might say this is like the oldest trick in the book, yada 
> yada yada...
> 
> 
> 		Martin
> 
> 
> 
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:51:27 -0800
> > Martin Olsson <mnemo@...imum.se> wrote:
> > 
> >> Dear kernel hackers,
> >>
> >> This is a message from below 0x7FFFFFFF. Please look at this bug (it's 
> >> not a new concept but still):
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/163185
> > 
> > It seems to want people to register to view it. I guess Ubuntu should fix
> > launchpad then we can see the bug report
> > 
> > Alan
> > -
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/