[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071116.162905.143357955.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:29:05 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dean@...tic.org
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, mucci@...utk.edu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...e.de, eranian@....hp.com, wcohen@...hat.com,
robert.richter@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ptools-perfapi@...utk.edu
Subject: Re: perfmon2 merge news
From: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:51:08 -0800 (PST)
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > I didn't see a clear list.
>
> - cross platform extensible API for configuring perf counters
> - support for multiplexed counters
> - support for virtualized 64-bit counters
> - support for PC and call graph sampling at specific intervals
> - support for reading counters not necessarily with sampling
> - taskswitch support for counters
> - API available from userland
> - ability to self-monitor: need select/poll/etc interface
> - support for PEBS, IBS and whatever other new perf monitoring
> infrastructure the vendors through at us in the future
> - low overhead: must minimize the "probe effect" of monitoring
> - low noise in measurements: cannot achieve this in userland
>
> permon2 has all of this and more i've probably neglected...
I want to state that even though I've been a stickler on the system
call stuff, in general I want to see perfmon2 go into tree and I agree
with how most of the infrastructure is implemented and the features it
provides.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists