[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <473EB138.80603@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:15:36 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NR_OPEN should be raised a litle bit
Alan Cox a écrit :
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:53:08 +0100
> Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
>
>> Time has come to change NR_OPEN value, some production servers hit the
>> not so 'ridiculously high value' of 1024*1024 file descriptors per process.
>
> Why fiddle with the kernel defaults when every distribution can manage
> this in user space - including picking defaults by memory size or
> platform ?
Please note I am not speaking about the standard 1024 filedescriptors limit,
but the hardcoded 1024*1024 one.
Tell me more how a user space can overcome this limit ?
Dynamically patching kernel text ?
static struct fdtable * alloc_fdtable(unsigned int nr)
{
...
nr /= (1024 / sizeof(struct file *));
nr = roundup_pow_of_two(nr + 1);
nr *= (1024 / sizeof(struct file *));
if (nr > NR_OPEN)
nr = NR_OPEN;
and :
int expand_files(struct files_struct *files, int nr)
{
struct fdtable *fdt;
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
/* Do we need to expand? */
if (nr < fdt->max_fds)
return 0;
/* Can we expand? */
if (nr >= NR_OPEN)
return -EMFILE;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists