[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071118222620.GN66820511@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:26:20 +1100
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dgc@....com>
Subject: Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:33:50PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 10:12 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > What specifically is wrong with dev->sem ?
>
> Nothing really, other than that they use semaphores to avoid lockdep :-/
>
> I think I know how to annotate this, after Alan Stern explained all the
> use cases, but I haven't come around to implementing it. Hope to do that
> soonish.
>
> Another real semaphore user is XFS, they really use the down/up
> asymmetry that semaphores allow, last time I spoke with Dave Chinner he
> didn't know a way around this.
Hasn't changed recently. We could convert some to completions, but
others are much more difficult.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists