linux-kernel - Re: even *more* unused CONFIG variables at no extra charge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071119134316.GA12158@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:43:16 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: even *more* unused CONFIG variables at no extra charge

On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 06:15:48AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> ==== sh64 ====
> >>>>> DEVICE_MEMORY_START
> >>>>> FLASH_MEMORY_START
> >>>>> HDSP253_LED
> >>>>> PCI_BLOCK_START
> >>>>> PCIDEVICE_MEMORY_START

Yeah, these are mostly bogus and just never got removed. I'll poke
through it and kill them off or fix up the Makefiles to actually use
them (as in the HDSP253_LED case). Thanks for catching these, these sorts
of reports are really useful.

Have you considered tidying up your config checker and adding it as a
static analyser target with the existing set? 'make configcheck' or
something would be a reasonable addition.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/