[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0711182156330.22727-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:04:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<r.marek@...embler.cz>, <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: broken suspend [Was: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1]
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > gives coretemp_cpu_callback -> coretemp_device_remove ->
> > platform_device_unregister, so coretemp seems to be what I have and you don't.
Yes.
For the coretemp developers: coretemp_cpu_callback() needs to be more
careful about what it does. During a system sleep transition (suspend,
hibernate, resume) it isn't possible to register or unregister a
device. Attempts to register will fail and attempts to unregister will
block until the system sleep is over -- and for this callback that
means hanging.
It's not clear what the best way is to fix this. Perhaps the CPU
notification should be sent along with a special flag indicating that
the CPU transition is part of a system sleep (although this seems
racy). Perhaps the driver should notice when a system sleep begins,
and defer all CPU-change handling until after the sleep is over.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists