[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071119152258.GB31426@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:22:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
efault@....de, skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task
groups
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> - inc/dec_load() takes a load input instead of task pointer input as their
> 2nd arg
> - inc/dec_nr_running don't call inc/dec_load. Instead,
> - enqueue/dequeue_task class callbacks call inc/dec_load
> - [Unintended/will-fix change] min/max tunables added in
> /proc/sys/kernel
>
> All of above changes (except last, which I will fix) should have zero
> functional+runtime effect for !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case. So I
> don't see how I can split Patch 2/2 further.
ok, as long as it's NOP for the CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED, we could try
it.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists