linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071119190057.GA12650@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:00:57 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	efault@....de, skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task
	groups


* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > ok, as long as it's NOP for the CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED, we could 
> > try it.
> 
> Ok ..thx. I was begining to make changes to avoid even the above minor 
> changes for !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case, but it doesn't look neat, 
> hence will drop that effort.

well please try it nevertheless, if the changes are not a NOP for the 
!FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case it's harder to determine that they are indeed 
harmless for the !FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/