linux-kernel - Re: SCSI breakage on non-cache coherent architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1195502116.6970.5.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:55:16 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: SCSI breakage on non-cache coherent architectures


> I'd like to be rid of it inside the command for various reasons:  every
> command has one of these, and they're expensive in the allocation (at 96
> bytes).  There's no reason we have to allocate and free that amount of
> space with every command.  In theory, the number of these is bounded at
> the queue depth, in practice, there's usually only one, and this DMA
> alignment issue does requires most drivers to double copy.

Do you have a plan for short term here ? I'd like something fixed
for .25, so I may have to introduce a __dma_aligned macro of some sort
to deal with that in the meantime...

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/