[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071119205000.GB25142@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:50:00 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David <david@...ux.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3,
v2.6.23.8,v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
* David <david@...ux.com> wrote:
> I have removed all other patches, and applied only cfs v24 above
> 2.6.23.8, and the compiler ran into (with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> enabled):
does the patch below help?
Ingo
Index: linux-cfs-2.6.23.8.q/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-cfs-2.6.23.8.q.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-cfs-2.6.23.8.q/kernel/sched.c
@@ -221,11 +221,14 @@ static struct cfs_rq *init_cfs_rq_p[NR_C
static DEFINE_MUTEX(doms_cur_mutex); /* serialize access to doms_curr[] array */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* kernel thread that runs rebalance_shares() periodically */
static struct task_struct *lb_monitor_task;
-static void set_se_shares(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned long shares);
static int load_balance_monitor(void *unused);
+#endif
+
+static void set_se_shares(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned long shares);
/* Default task group.
* Every task in system belong to this group at bootup.
@@ -5178,6 +5181,8 @@ static int migration_thread(void *data)
struct migration_req *req;
struct list_head *head;
+ try_to_freeze();
+
spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) {
@@ -5595,6 +5600,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
p = kthread_create(migration_thread, hcpu, "migration/%d", cpu);
if (IS_ERR(p))
return NOTIFY_BAD;
+ p->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
kthread_bind(p, cpu);
/* Must be high prio: stop_machine expects to yield to it. */
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
@@ -6050,7 +6056,7 @@ static int cpu_to_core_group(int cpu, co
struct sched_group **sg)
{
int group;
- cpumask_t mask = per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, cpu);
+ cpumask_t mask = cpu_sibling_map(cpu);
cpus_and(mask, mask, *cpu_map);
group = first_cpu(mask);
if (sg)
@@ -6079,7 +6085,7 @@ static int cpu_to_phys_group(int cpu, co
cpus_and(mask, mask, *cpu_map);
group = first_cpu(mask);
#elif defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
- cpumask_t mask = per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, cpu);
+ cpumask_t mask = cpu_sibling_map(cpu);
cpus_and(mask, mask, *cpu_map);
group = first_cpu(mask);
#else
@@ -6313,7 +6319,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const cpu
p = sd;
sd = &per_cpu(cpu_domains, i);
*sd = SD_SIBLING_INIT;
- sd->span = per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i);
+ sd->span = cpu_sibling_map(i);
cpus_and(sd->span, sd->span, *cpu_map);
sd->parent = p;
p->child = sd;
@@ -6324,7 +6330,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const cpu
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
/* Set up CPU (sibling) groups */
for_each_cpu_mask(i, *cpu_map) {
- cpumask_t this_sibling_map = per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i);
+ cpumask_t this_sibling_map = cpu_sibling_map(i);
cpus_and(this_sibling_map, this_sibling_map, *cpu_map);
if (i != first_cpu(this_sibling_map))
continue;
@@ -6742,7 +6748,7 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
BUG();
sched_init_granularity();
-#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
lb_monitor_task = kthread_create(load_balance_monitor, NULL,
"load_balance_monitor");
if (!IS_ERR(lb_monitor_task))
@@ -7006,7 +7012,7 @@ void set_curr_task(int cpu, struct task_
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
/* distribute shares of all task groups among their schedulable entities,
* to reflect load distrbution across cpus.
@@ -7138,6 +7144,9 @@ static int load_balance_monitor(void *un
return 0;
}
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
/* allocate runqueue etc for a new task group */
struct task_group *sched_create_group(void)
{
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists