[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1195509320.6970.9.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:55:20 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: SCSI breakage on non-cache coherent architectures
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 13:43 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > I've been debugging various issues on the PowerPC 44x embedded
> > architecture which happens to have non-coherent PCI DMA.
> >
> > One of the problem I'm hitting is that one really need to enforce
> > kmalloc alignement to cache lines or bad things will happen (among
> > others with USB), for some reasons, powerpc failed to do so, I fixed it.
>
> Heh... I hit the same problem literally 5 years ago:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/1783/
>
> I implemented the __dma_buffer annotation:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/2269/
>
> But DaveM said we should just use the PCI pool code instead:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/2270/
Heh, well...
In this case, DaveM just proposed something akin to your
__dma_buffer :-)
On the other hand, after discussing with James, it looks like we'll just
be reverting the patch that removed the kmalloc of the sense buffer
since non cache-coherent archs are supposed to enforce kmalloc alignment
to cache lines.
__dma_buffer still seems like a good thing to have if too many other
drivers are hitting that but for this specific problem, it's not the
approach that we'll be taking.
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists