[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711190114.55604.rob@landley.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:14:55 -0600
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix UML broken (was Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1)
On Sunday 18 November 2007 15:32:03 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:17:49PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a
> > > > link? (Or a bit more specificity than "a few weeks ago"?)
> > >
> > > Here are the three patches:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916329510&w=2
> >
> > Doesn't contain a patch.
>
> Took me one minute to locate PATCH 1 + 2:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916429513&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916229500&w=2
>
> Maybe this helps you.
Same problem as previous message: they don't apply to 2.6.23. (I tried both
2.6.23 and 2.6.23.8, just to be sure.)
I don't suppose putting #ifndef guards around whatever sparc.h file hasn't got
them is a reasonable hack to get this worked around during 2.6.23.x?
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists