linux-kernel - Re: Query on kernel metrics available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:29:36 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	raju@...ux-delhi.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Query on kernel metrics available

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:59:26 +0530
Raj Mathur <raju@...ux-delhi.org> wrote:

> A competing OS vendor is claiming that the Linux kernel has no way to 
> measure the following:
> 
> a. Time spent waiting for page faults in percent
> 
> b. Total transfer time for each auxiliary memory in percent
> 
> c. Time in percent when one or more tasks were blocked waiting for 
> memory resources
> 
> d. Time spent waiting for page faults in percent

a an d appear to be the same thing

> I was wondering if the claims were pure FUD or are measurements 
> possible -- whether they are actually implemented or not is not 
> important (at least at this stage).  Apologies if the descriptions 
> aren't very precise; OTOH that leaves us room to interpret the claims 
> in a favourable (to us) manner :)

Systemtap as shipped by most of the enterprise vendors can measure all of
this quite easily. 

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/