linux-kernel - Re: SCSI breakage on non-cache coherent architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1195520101.6970.28.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:55:01 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	rmk@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: SCSI breakage on non-cache coherent architectures


On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 16:46 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> 
> 1) Require that entire buffers are commited by call sites,
>    and thus "embedding" DMA'd within non-DMA stuff isn't allowed
> 
> 2) Add the __dma_cacheline_aligned tag.
> 
> But note that with #2 it could get quite ugly because the
> alignment and size both have a minimum that needs to be
> enforced, not just the alignment alone.  So either:

Yup.

> struct foo {
>         unsigned int other_unrelated_stuff;
> 
>         struct object dma_thing __dma_cacheline_aligned;
> 
>         unsigned int more_nondma_stuff __dma_cacheline_aligned;
> };

In my tests, I had used a "fuckton_t" object defined to be an empty
thing with alignment constraint, seemed to work :-) But I'd rather
require #1.

BTW. What is the status nowadays with skb's ?

Cheers,
Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/