linux-kernel - Re: build #337 failed for 2.6.24-rc1-gb1d08ac In function `usbnet_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071119.212639.217993660.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:26:39 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bunk@...nel.org
Cc:	david-b@...bell.net, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	toralf.foerster@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: build #337 failed for 2.6.24-rc1-gb1d08ac In function
 `usbnet_set_settings':

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 04:30:10 +0100

> @davem:
> 
> Please look at net/ipv4/arp.c:arp_process()
> 
> Am I right that CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=n and CONFIG_NETDEV_1000=y or 
> CONFIG_NETDEV_10000=y will not be handled correctly there?
> 
> And the best solution is to nuke all #ifdef's in this function and make 
> the code unconditionally available?

I think removing those specific ifdefs in arp_process()
is the best option, yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/