linux-kernel - Re: Is there any word about this bug in gcc ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071120053904.GG2472@hacking>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:39:05 +0800
From:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	zhengyi <goodmenkernel@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is there any word about this bug in gcc ?

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 09:10:44PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>WANG Cong wrote:
>>On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:13:42AM +0800, zhengyi wrote:
>>>Is there any relevance to the kernel ?
>>>
>>>I found the folowing code here:
>>>http://linux.solidot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/19/0512218&from=rss
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>int main( void )
>>>{
>>> int i=2;
>>> if( -10*abs (i-1) == 10*abs(i-1) )
>>>   printf ("OMG,-10==10 in linux!\n");
>>> else
>>>   printf ("nothing special here\n") ;
>>>
>>> return 0 ;
>>>}
>>
>>I think no. It is considered a bug in abs(), kernel, of course,
>>doesn't use glibc's abs().
>>
>
>Wrong.
>
>abs() is internal to gcc, and the above is optimized out at compile 
>time, so any user of abs() as a function at all is vulnerable.

This is an urgent bug, I think.

And you mean abs() is not in glibc, then where is it? Built in gcc?
And what's more, why not put it in glibc?

Thanks.

>
>However, the Linux kernel defines abs() as a macro:
>
>#define abs(x) ({                               \
>                int __x = (x);                  \
>                (__x < 0) ? -__x : __x;         \
>        })
>
>... which means gcc never sees it.  So the kernel isn't affected, 
>because it doesn't use *gcc's* abs().

Thanks for clarifying this!

Regards.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/